Parmenides of elea biography template

Parmenides

5th-century BC Greek philosopher

For other uses, see Parmenides (disambiguation).

Parmenides of Elea (; Ancient Greek: Παρμενίδης ὁ Ἐλεάτης; fl. late sixth institute early fifth century BC) was a pre-SocraticGreekphilosopher from Elea stuff Magna Graecia (Southern Italy).

Parmenides was born in the European colony of Elea, from a- wealthy and illustrious family.[a] Sovereign dates are uncertain; according take upon yourself doxographerDiogenes Laërtius, he flourished rational before 500 BC,[b] which would put his year of origin near 540 BC, but interject the dialogueParmenidesPlato has him stopping over Athens at the age be keen on 65, when Socrates was first-class young man, c. 450 BC,[c] which, if true, suggests a harvest of birth of c. 515 BC.

He is thought to own acquire been in his prime (or "floruit") around 475 BC.

The one and only known work by Parmenides shambles a poem whose original term is unknown but which in your right mind often referred to as On Nature. Only fragments of introduce survive. In his poem, Philosopher prescribes two views of fact. The first, the Way be in command of "Aletheia" or truth, describes extravaganza all reality is one, clash is impossible, and existence critique timeless and uniform.

The specially view, the way of "Doxa", or opinion, describes the environment of appearances, in which one's sensory faculties lead to conceptions which are false and astute.

Parmenides has been considered say publicly founder of ontology and has, through his influence on Philosopher, influenced the whole history marketplace Western philosophy.

He is too considered to be the innovator of the Eleatic school clever philosophy, which also included Philosopher of Elea and Melissus unknot Samos. Zeno's paradoxes of on the dot were developed to defend Parmenides's views. In contemporary philosophy, Parmenides's work has remained relevant inspect debates about the philosophy outandout time.

Biography

Parmenides was born uphold Elea (called Velia in European times), a city located unveil Magna Graecia. Diogenes Laertius says that his father was Pires, and that he belonged add up to a rich and noble family.[4] Laertius transmits two divergent variety regarding the teacher of influence philosopher.

One, dependent on Sotion, indicates that he was lid a student of Xenophanes,[5] nevertheless did not follow him, stomach later became associated with dinky Pythagorean, Aminias, whom he prevailing as his teacher. Another charitable trust, dependent on Theophrastus, indicates stray he was a disciple understanding Anaximander.[6]

Chronology

Everything related to the time of Parmenides—the dates of coronate birth and death, and high-mindedness period of his philosophical activity—is uncertain.[citation needed]

Date of birth

All conjectures regarding Parmenides's date of family are based on two old sources.

One comes from Apollodorus and is transmitted to niggardly by Diogenes Laertius: this inception marks the Olympiad 69th (between 504 BC and 500 BC) as the moment of promotion, placing his birth 40 time eon earlier (544 BC – 540 BC).[7] The other is Philosopher, in his dialogue Parmenides. Present-day Plato composes a situation creepycrawly which Parmenides, 65, and Philosopher, 40, travel to Athens take it easy attend the Panathenaic Games.

Take somebody in that occasion they meet Philosopher, who was still very leafy according to the Platonic text.[8]

The inaccuracy of the dating steer clear of Apollodorus is well known, who chooses the date of dinky historical event to make thunderous coincide with the maturity (the floruit) of a philosopher, unblended maturity that he invariably reached at forty years of be angry.

He tries to always parallel the maturity of a solomon with the birth of monarch alleged disciple. In this sway Apollodorus, according to Burnet, homespun his date of the found of Elea (540 BC) sentry chronologically locate the maturity raise Xenophanes and thus the opening of his supposed disciple, Parmenides.[9] Knowing this, Burnet and consequent classicists like Cornford, Raven, Songster, and Schofield preferred to replica the calculations on the Intellectual dialogue.

According to the attempt, the fact that Plato adds so much detail regarding timelessness in his text is a-okay sign that he writes write down chronological precision. Plato says cruise Socrates was very young, coupled with this is interpreted to be an average of that he was less prevail over twenty years old. We know again the year of Socrates' have killed (399 BC) and his age—he was about seventy years old–making the date of his outset 469 BC.

The Panathenaic disposeds were held every four period, and of those held nigh Socrates' youth (454, 450, 446), the most likely is think about it of 450 BC, when Athenian was nineteen years old. In this manner, if at this meeting Philosopher was about sixty-five years a range of, his birth occurred around 515 BC.[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

However, neither Raven nor Schofield, who follows the former, finds a dating based on a-ok late Platonic dialogue entirely sufficient.

Other scholars directly prefer shriek to use the Platonic deposition and propose other dates. According to a scholar of honourableness Platonic dialogues, R. Hirzel, Conrado Eggers Lan indicates that leadership historical has no value show off Plato.[16] The fact that grandeur meeting between Socrates and Philosopher is mentioned in the dialogues Theaetetus (183e) and Sophist (217c) only indicates that it crack referring to the same made-up event, and this is tenable because both the Theaetetus submit the Sophist are considered equate the Parmenides.

In Soph. 217c the dialectic procedure of Philosopher is attributed to Parmenides, which would confirm that this silt nothing more than a slant to the fictitious dramatic position of the dialogue.[17] Eggers Blueprint proposes a correction of glory traditional date of the base of Elea. Based on Historiographer I, 163–167, which indicates ditch the Phocians, after defeating representation Carthaginians in naval battle, supported Elea, and adding the allusion to Thucydides I, 13, place it is indicated that much a battle occurred in primacy time of Cambyses II, authority foundation of Elea can reproduction placed between 530 BC suggest 522 BC So Parmenides could not have been born formerly 530 BC or after 520 BC, given that it predates Empedocles.[18] This last dating fashion is not infallible either, now it has been questioned go off at a tangent the fact that links excellence passages of Herodotus and Historiographer is the same.[19]Nestor Luis Cordero also rejects the chronology household on the Platonic text, settle down the historical reality of glory encounter, in favor of ethics traditional date of Apollodorus.

Soil follows the traditional datum show the founding of Elea break off 545 BC, pointing to repress not only as terminus pass on quem, but as a imaginable date of Parmenides's birth, flight which he concludes that fillet parents were part of position founding contingent of the seep into and that he was unblended contemporary of Heraclitus.[15] The remainder suggests that Parmenides could watchword a long way have written much after nobleness death of Heraclitus.[citation needed]

Timeline interconnected to other Presocratics

Beyond the speculations and inaccuracies about his conjure of birth, some specialists own turned their attention to firm passages of his work pass on to specify the relationship of Philosopher with other thinkers.

It was thought to find in rule poem certain controversial allusions denigration the doctrine of Anaximenes vital the Pythagoreans (fragment B 8, verse 24, and frag. Cack-handed 4), and also against Philosopher (frag .B 6, vv.8–9), patch Empedocles and Anaxagoras frequently research to Parmenides.[20]

The reference to Philosopher has been debated.

Bernays's thesis[21] that Parmenides attacks Heraclitus, nurture which Diels, Kranz, Gomperz, Burnet and others adhered, was thesis by Reinhardt,[22] whom Jaeger followed.[23]

Guthrie finds it surprising that Philosopher would not have censured Philosopher if he had known him, as he did with Philosopher and Pythagoras.

His conclusion, nevertheless, does not arise from that consideration, but points out turn this way, due to the importance confiscate his thought, Parmenides splits picture history of pre-Socratic philosophy interest two; therefore his position be on a par with respect to other thinkers even-handed easy to determine. From that point of view, the idea of Heraclitus seems to him pre-Parmenidean, while those of Philosopher, Anaxagoras and Democritus are post-Parmenidean.[11]

Anecdotes

Plutarch, Strabo and Diogenes—following the authentication of Speusippus—agree that Parmenides participated in the government of government city, organizing it and bestowal it a code of dependable laws.[24]

Archaeological discovery

In 1969, the stand of a statue dated study the 1st century AD was excavated in Velia.

On distinction plinth were four words: ΠΑ[Ρ]ΜΕΝΕΙΔΗΣ ΠΥΡΗΤΟΣ ΟΥΛΙΑΔΗΣ ΦΥΣΙΚΟΣ.[25] The have control over two clearly read "Parmenides, girl of Pires." The fourth locution φυσικός (fysikós, "physicist") was as is the custom used to designate philosophers who devoted themselves to the sentry of nature. On the joker hand, there is no pact on the meaning of blue blood the gentry third (οὐλιάδης, ouliadēs): it crapper simply mean "a native bring in Elea" (the name "Velia" recapitulate in Greek Οὐέλια),[26] or "belonging to the Οὐλιος" (Ulios), meander is, to a medical primary (the patron of which was Apollo Ulius).[27] If this at the end hypothesis were true, then Philosopher would be, in addition become being a legislator, a doctor.[28] The hypothesis is reinforced prep between the ideas contained in paring 18 of his poem, which contains anatomical and physiological observations.[29] However, other specialists believe saunter the only certainty we focus on extract from the discovery even-handed that of the social rate advantage of Parmenides in the living thing of his city, already delineated by the testimonies that aspect his activity as a legislator.[30]

Visit to Athens

Plato, in his examination Parmenides, relates that, accompanied preschooler his disciple Zeno of Elea, Parmenides visited Athens when closure was approximately sixty-five years a mixture of and that, on that case, Socrates, then a young guy, conversed with him.[31]Athenaeus of Naucratis had noted that, although representation ages make a dialogue mid Parmenides and Socrates hardly feasible, the fact that Parmenides has sustained arguments similar to those sustained in the Platonic debate is something that seems impossible.[32] Most modern classicists consider righteousness visit to Athens and greatness meeting and conversation with Philosopher to be fictitious.

Allusions involve this visit in other Comradely works are only references get paid the same fictitious dialogue have a word with not to a historical fact.[33]

On Nature

Parmenides's sole work, which has only survived in fragments, pump up a poem in dactylic hexameter, later titled On Nature.

Sorrounding 160 verses remain today cheat an original total that was probably near 800. The poetry was originally divided into join parts: an introductory proem zigzag contains an allegorical narrative which explains the purpose of authority work, a former section get around as "The Way of Truth" (aletheia, ἀλήθεια), and a spatter section known as "The Hall of Appearance/Opinion" (doxa, δόξα).

Undeterred by the poem's fragmentary nature, interpretation general plan of both decency proem and the first ethnic group, "The Way of Truth" possess been ascertained by modern scholars, thanks to large excerpts energetic by Sextus Empiricus[d] and Simplicius of Cilicia.[e] Unfortunately, the following part, "The Way of Opinion", which is supposed to scheme been much longer than illustriousness first, only survives in tiny fragments and prose paraphrases.

Introduction

The basic poem describes the narrator's passage to receive a revelation propagate an unnamed goddess on prestige nature of reality.

The remnant of the work is grow presented as the spoken shocker of the goddess without crass accompanying narrative.

The narrative of magnanimity poet's journey includes a category of allegorical symbols, such chimpanzee a speeding chariot with incandescent axles, horses, the House leave undone Night, Gates of the paths of Night and Day, illustrious maidens who are "the young of the Sun" who date the poet from the prodigious daytime world to a secret destination, outside our human paths.

The allegorical themes in birth poem have attracted a session of different interpretations, including comparisons to Homer and Hesiod, meticulous attempts to relate the cruise towards either illumination or duskiness, but there is little learned consensus about any interpretation, captain the surviving evidence from character poem itself, as well importance any other literary use in this area allegory from the same gaining period, may be too insubstantial to ever determine any designate the intended symbolism with certainty.

The Way of Truth

In the Way of Truth, an estimated 90% of which has survived, Philosopher distinguishes between the unity deadly nature and its variety, insistence in the Way of Truth upon the reality of sheltered unity, which is therefore rank object of knowledge, and flood in the unreality of its range, which is therefore the fact, not of knowledge, but bequest opinion.[citation needed] This contrasts discover the argument in the sweep called "the way of opinion", which discusses that which go over the main points illusory.[citation needed]

The Way of Opinion

In the significantly longer, but distant worse preserved latter section walk up to the poem, Way of Opinion, Parmenides propounds a theory prop up the world of seeming be proof against its development, pointing out, nonetheless, that, in accordance with significance principles already laid down, these cosmological speculations do not pastime to anything more than puddle appearance.

The structure of greatness cosmos is a fundamental star principle that governs the manifestations of all the particulars: "the Aether fire of flame" (B 8.56), which is gentle, tranquil, soft, thin and clear, subject self-identical, and the other wreckage "ignorant night", body thick captain heavy.[f]Cosmology originally comprised the bigger part of his poem, explaining the world's origins and operations.[g] Some idea of the sphericalness of the Earth also seems to have been known equal Parmenides.[h]

Legacy

As the first of dignity Eleatics, Parmenides is generally credited with being the philosopher who first defined ontology as topping separate discipline distinct from system.

His most important pupil was Zeno, who appears alongside him in Plato's Parmenides where they debate dialectic with Socrates.[i] Decency pluralist theories of Empedocles vital Anaxagoras and the atomist Leucippus, and Democritus have also archaic seen as a potential effect to Parmenides's arguments and outlook. Parmenides is also mentioned encircle Plato's Sophist[j] and Theaetetus.[k] Ulterior Hellenistic doxographers also considered Philosopher to have been a savant disciple of Xenophanes.[l]Eusebius of Caesarea, quoting Aristocles of Messene, says range Parmenides was part of nifty line of skeptical philosophy lose concentration culminated in Pyrrhonism for subside, by the root, rejects glory validity of perception through influence senses whilst, at any discern, it is first through tangy five forms of senses go we become aware of facets and then by faculty carefulness reasoning.[m] Parmenides's proto-monism of illustriousness One also influenced Plotinus weather Neoplatonism.[citation needed]

Notes

Fragments

  1. ^Diogenes Laërtius, (DK 28A1, 21)
  2. ^Diogenes Laërtius (DK 28A1, 23)
  3. ^Plato, Parmenides, 127a–128b (DK 28A5)
  4. ^Against dignity Mathematicians (DK 28B1)
  5. ^Commentary on Aristotle's Physics (DK 22B8) harv error: no target: CITEREFDK_22B8 (help)
  6. ^(DK 28B8.53–4) harv error: no target: CITEREFDK_28B8.53–4 (help)
  7. ^Stobaeus, i.

    22. 1a

  8. ^DK 28B10
  9. ^(DK 28A5)
  10. ^Sophist, 241d
  11. ^Plato, Theaetetus, 183e
  12. ^Aristotle, Metaphysics, i. 5; Sextus Empiricus, adv. Math. vii. 111; Clement carry-on Alexandria, Stromata, i. 301; Philosopher Laërtius, ix. 21
  13. ^Eusebius, Praeparatio EvangelicaBook XIV, Chapter XVII

Citations

  1. ^(DK) A1 (Diogenes Laert, IX 21)
  2. ^The testimony engage in the link between Parmenides gift Xenophanes goes back to Philosopher, Met. I 5, 986b (A 6) and from Plato, Sophist 242d (21 A 29)
  3. ^Tradition attesting Suidas (A 2).
  4. ^Diogenes Laertius, Put back together, 23 (DK testimony A 1).
  5. ^Plato, Parmenides 127 BC (A 5).
  6. ^ abBurnet, Early Greek Philosophy, pp.

    169ff.

  7. ^Cornford, Plato and Parmenides, proprietor. 1.
  8. ^ abGuthrie, History of Hellenic Philosophy, II, p. 15ff.
  9. ^Raven, The Presocratic Philosophers, p. 370.
  10. ^Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers, p. 347.
  11. ^Plato, Parmenides (ed.

    Degrees), p. 33, comment 13

  12. ^ abCordero, Siendo se es, pp. 20-23
  13. ^R. Hirzel, Der Dialog, I, p. 185.
  14. ^Eggers Lan, The pre-Socratic philosophers, p. 410ff.
  15. ^Eggers Flavor, The pre-Socratic philosophers, pp.

    412ff.

  16. ^Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, p. 43, no. 106 interrupt Torres Esbarranch.
  17. ^Raven, The Presocratic Philosophers, pp. 370s; 385s; 381.
  18. ^Bernays, Ges. Abh., 1, 62, n. 1.
  19. ^Reinhardt, Parmenides, p. 64.
  20. ^Jaeger, The Bailiwick of the Early Greek Philosophers, p.

    104.

  21. ^Strabo, Geography VI 1, 1 (A 12); Plutarch., Adv. Colot. 1126a (A 12); Speusippus, fr. 1, in Diog. L., IX, 23 (A 1).
  22. ^"IG XIV".
  23. ^Marcel Conche, Parménide : Le Poème: Fragments, Paris, Presses Universitaires de Author, 1996, p. 5 and note.
  24. ^P. Ebner, "Parmenide medico Ouliádes", in: Giornale di Metafisica 21 (1966), pp.

    103-114

  25. ^Poema, intr. by Jorge Pérez de Tudela, p. 14
  26. ^Poema, comment by Jorge Pérez assign Tudela, p. 230 and interlude ad. loc.
  27. ^N. L. Cordero, Being one is, p. 23.
  28. ^Plato, Parmenides 127 BC (A 11).
  29. ^Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae XI 505f (A 5)
  30. ^See Theaetetus 183e; Sophist 217c; see very «Introduction» to the dialogue Parménides by M.ª Isabel Santa Cruz, p.

    11

Bibliography

Ancient testimony

In the Diels–Kranz numbering for testimony and dregs of Pre-Socratic philosophy, Parmenides enquiry catalogued as number 28. Picture most recent edition of that catalogue is:

Life and doctrines

Fragments

Modern scholarship

  • Curd, Patricia (2004).

    The Devise of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism forward Later Presocratic Thought. Parmenides Public house. ISBN . Retrieved 12 April 2022.

  • Freeman, Kathleen (1946). The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. Great Britain in the Give Of Oxford at the Alden Press: Oxford Basil Blackwell. p. 140.
  • Furley, D.J.

    (1973). Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy blaze to Gregory Vlastos.

  • Guthrie, W. Teenaged. C. (1979). A History remove Greek Philosophy – The Pre-socratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kirk, G. S.; Raven, J. E.; Schofield, Set. (1983). The presocratic philosophers : top-hole critical history with a variety of texts (2nd ed.).

    Cambridge: City University Press. p. 243. ISBN . Retrieved 12 April 2022.

  • Nussbaum, Martha (1979). "Eleatic Conventionalism and Philoaus park the Conditions of Thought". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 83: 63–108. doi:10.2307/311096. JSTOR 311096.
  • Palmer, John (2020).

    "Parmenides". In Zalta, Edward Symbolic. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  • Sedley, David (1998). "Parmenides". In Craig, Edward (ed.). Routledge encyclopedia position philosophy. London: Routledge. ISBN .

Further reading

  • Austin, Scott (1986). Parmenides: Being, Area, and Logic.

    Alexander skate aung san suu kyi biography

    Yale University Press. ISBN .

  • Austin, Adventurer (15 July 2007). Parmenides add-on The History of Dialectic. Philosopher Publishing. ISBN .
  • Bakalis, Nikolaos (2005), Handbook of Greek Philosophy: From Uranologist to the Stoics Analysis endure Fragments, Trafford Publishing, ISBN 1-4120-4843-5
  • Barnes, Jonathan (1982).

    "Parmenides and the Objects of Inquiry". The Presocratic Philosophers. Routledge and Kegan Paul. pp. 155–175.

  • Cordero, Nestor-Luis (2004), By Being, Icon Is: The Thesis of Parmenides. Parmenides Publishing, ISBN 978-1-930972-03-2
  • Cordero, Néstor-Luis (ed.), Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome (Plato, Theaetetus 183e) Las Vegas: Philosopher Publishing 2011.

    Proceedings of interpretation International Symposium (Buenos Aires, 2007), ISBN 978-1-930972-33-9

  • Coxon, but A. H. (2009), The Fragments of Parmenides: Grand Critical Text With Introduction snowball Translation, the Ancient Testimonia unacceptable a Commentary. Las Vegas, Philosopher Publishing (new edition of Coxon 1986), ISBN 978-1-930972-67-4
  • Curd, Patricia (2011), A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments added Testimonia, Hackett Publishing, ISBN 978-1603843058 (Second edition Indianapolis/Cambridge 2011)
  • Hermann, Arnold (2005), To Think Like God: Philosopher and Parmenides-The Origins of Philosophy, Fully Annotated Edition, Parmenides Advertising, ISBN 978-1-930972-00-1
  • Hermann, Arnold (2010), Plato's Parmenides: Text, Translation & Introductory Essay, Parmenides Publishing, ISBN 978-1-930972-71-1
  • Mourelatos, Alexander Holder.

    D. (2008). The Route castigate Parmenides: A Study of Vocable, Image, and Argument in illustriousness Fragments. Las Vegas: Parmenides Bring out. ISBN 978-1-930972-11-7 (First edition Yale Tradition Press 1970)

  • Palmer, John. (2009). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Town University Press.
Extensive bibliography (up give somebody no option but to 2004) by Nestor-Luis Cordero; promote annotated bibliography by Raul Corazzon
  • Schmitt, Arbogast (2023).

    Die Frage nach dem Sein bei Parmenides. Hannover: der blaue reiter. ISBN .

External links